
Mayor Karen Bass and Kathryn Barger are urging the state to help fire survivors receive the insurance proceeds they’re owed.
Photo: RICH SCHMITT
(This Op-Ed first appeared in the L.A. Daily News on August 17 and is reprinted with permission from the Mayor’s office.)
By: LA MAYOR KAREN BASS and L.A. COUNTY SUPERVISOR CHAIR KATHRYN BARGER
It’s been seven months since the most destructive wildfires in Los Angeles County’s history tore through our communities. For thousands of survivors, a terrible struggle persists: one against delays, underpayments, and indifference from the core institution meant to help people recover.
The wildfires that erupted on January 7 tragically killed 31 people and damaged or destroyed more than 16,000 structures across our county–from Pacific Palisades to Malibu to Altadena–changing lives and the landscape of Los Angeles forever.
Rebuilding is underway and we’re making progress. In the communities we represent–Pacific Palisades in the City of Los Angeles and Altadena in unincorporated Los Angeles County–debris removal is more than 95% complete. Hundreds of homes are moving through the permitting process. In the City and County, more than 400 permits have been issued, and home construction is underway. But despite this progress, one painful problem remains: the insurance system.
A new report by the Department of Angels reveals that 70% of insured Eaton and Palisades fire survivors are facing delays, denials, or underpayments that are derailing their recovery and preventing them from making basic decisions about their futures.
As local elected officials, we don’t have jurisdiction over the insurance industry. But we do represent constituents–many of whom lost everything–and we cannot remain silent when those we serve are being failed in their time of greatest need.
Unfortunately, what we’re witnessing in Los Angeles County isn’t unique. Across California and the nation, the insurance industry is increasingly under strain, hampering people’s ability to recover from disasters and making it harder to prepare for the next one.
California Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara has launched investigations into the claims practices of the California Fair Plan and State Farm. We support this scrutiny and believe stronger oversight and reforms are urgently needed.
As we work to rebuild our communities, there are also serious questions about the health of the private insurance market. According to the Center for American Progress, in the wake of more and more costly disasters, insurers are reducing coverage, exiting high-risk markets, and dramatically raising premiums. For many Americans, the high cost of coverage leaves them unprotected.
Last year alone, there were 27 weather and climate disasters with losses exceeding $1 billion each in the U.S. and costing a combined total of more than $182 billion in damage.
This is why we’re joining the growing call for change. The insurance industry must step up–and state regulators must ensure they do.
In response to the concerns of hundreds of fire survivors, we are calling for a series of reforms that would strengthen consumer protections and accelerate recovery for wildfire survivors.
First, insurers must be required to pay out maximum amounts allowable under all coverage categories in existing insurance contracts for policyholders who are underinsured. This would provide families with the capital they need to rebuild and move forward.
Second, systemic complaints stemming from the Eaton and Palisades Fires against insurance companies must be fully evaluated before any rate increases are considered.
Third, insurers should offer meaningful discounts to customers who meet or exceed home hardening and fire resiliency standards.
We also urge the Legislature to pass Senate Bill 495, which would allow policyholders who lose their homes to claim 60% of personal property coverage without itemization–or up to 100% with itemization–to speed up recovery, and we urge insurance providers to proactively implement this policy.
We support increased transparency and accountability, including efforts to create a set of best practices and a state-issued insurance report card that scores insurers on claims handling, speed, and customer service.
And, finally, we urge Commissioner Lara’s Smoke Claims and Remediation Task Force to move swiftly in developing long-overdue insurance coverage standards for the testing and remediation of smoke-damaged homes.
This past January, Los Angeles endured the worst natural disaster in its history. Families are doing everything they can to rebuild their lives–a reality they never anticipated. The last thing they need is a second crisis at the hands of the insurance industry. It’s time for the insurers and regulators to step up and meet the moment with urgency, compassion, and action.
I am extremely concern about when my insurance comes due in March 2026. I was a lucky resident who didn’t lose my home but had internal damage due to smoke and ash. If I can’t afford insurance I will lose my home of 51 years. I am praying and hoping the Commissioner Lara is already looking into rates. I am trying to prepare myself for losing my home. Not sure what I can do. Already contacted the dept of insurance but they can not assure me and what the future will bring.
Will this be the wake up call that gets Lara to make sure that insurance companies bail out Palisades residents? Do Bass and Barger know that if Lara acquiesces to the demands of Bass and Lara, and gets tough with insurance companies, that he will be known as the guy who blew up the insurance market in California? Of course they do. Bass and Barger could have appealed directly to the insurance companies to voice their complaints since the insurance companies are as likely to listen to Lara, Bass, Barger, a homeless person on the Santa Monica pier or any random person. Meaning the insurance companies are not going to listen to anyone since no government official or individual has any power over the insurance companies. This piece by Bass and Barger is cheap reelection campaign fluffery.
Who can make the SB 495 happen? It is upsetting that I live in a pre-fire home worth $4-5 million dollars for over 42 years and I have to account for the personal property. I would guess that most of us who lived in the Alphabet Street did not have dumpy interiors.
In May of 2025 the U.S. Senate held hearings that exposed industry-wide malfeasance and fraud involving all of the major home insurers in the country. Here’s a link to the hearings: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qs2VKoQPvxY&t=129s
As satisfying as it is to see insurance execs called out for decades of cheating policyholders, a few months later it’s clear that being exposed hasn’t had any impact on them. Allstate, State Farm et al have been cheating their customers for decades and have no intention of stopping. It started 20+ years ago when Allstate brought in the McKinsey consulting group to advise them on how to increase their bottom line. McKinsey told Allstate to stop thinking of policyholders as clients and see them instead as “profit centers” – they even gave Allstate the “delay, deny and defend” slogan. Allstate followed their advice and their profits soared – and, predictably, the other big insurers followed suit. And here we are. As shocking as the videos of those Senate hearings are – they seem to have had absolutely no impact on the rampant corruption in the insurance industry. Allstate and the other big insurance companies continue to delay, deny and defend with impunity – and line their shareholder’s and CEO’s pockets at the expense of Eaton and Palisades disaster survivors.
This doesn’t begin to address the help we need from our government. Most likely of us have no idea experience managing remediation or building or dealing with insurance companies. We need actual guidance, not asking nicely for insurance companies to honor their contracts. Thoughts and prayers? What BS. By the way, when I was renewing with State Farm a couple of years ago they told me they had paid 75% of personal property limits without itemization on Woolsey Fire victims policies. What is she doing asking for 60%? That’s ridiculous.
in this case I’m better off saying nothing at all…