Bonin Points Fingers: Not My Fault

(Editor’s note: This viewpoint “COLUMN: Bonin Points Fingers, Yet the Ramada Boondoggle Began on His Watch” first appeared in the Westside Current 24 and is reprinted with permission.)

The Ramada in Venice was bought by the city for $10 million to be used for housing the homeless.

By ANGELA MCGREGOR

Behind every failure, there is finger-pointing.  Consider, for example, the still-to-get-started Marina Del Rey Ramada conversion to low-income housing, which has thus far cost the city over $19.5 million.

When asked on X if he took responsibility for that boondoggle, via a re-post to his feed of our Ramada reporting (under the caption, “This you?”), former CD11 Councilmember Mike Bonin responded, “No.  That would be my successor.  Her candidacy was born out of her opposition to this project in her neighborhood, and the project has languished, unempty, during the entirety of her tenure.  Meanwhile, she has been shutting down shelters and blocking housing.”

Mike Bonin

By his successor, Bonin of course means current CD11 Councilmember Traci Park, and he’s correct that the project has been languishing during her tenure.  But it was in October 2022, when Bonin was still in office, that the City allowed the developer, PATH Ventures, to empty the former motel after it had been serving as temporary housing for just 14 months, under the pretense that renovations were imminent.

In fact, the City Administrator told the Current that they regret having allowed the property to be vacated, given that its zero-interest, five-year mortgage mandated that it be used as temporary housing for “3 to 5 years” and PATH Ventures was actually nowhere near ready to start work.
Was Councilmember Bonin unaware that the CAO had allowed the property to be vacated in violation of the terms of its Homekey-funded mortgage?  Considering the fact that, in a glowing profile in the Nation a year earlier, he had blamed his championing of the project for an attempt to recall him, that seems unlikely.

If she’s “shutting down shelters and blocking housing”, Traci Park has an odd way of doing it.  In June, 2023 she introduced a motion to extend the operations of the Venice Bridge Home for another six months, stating that “Beds in interim housing like the Venice Bridge Home are essential to getting people off the streets and onto a path of permanent housing.”  At last month’s “grand opening” of the 98-unit, income-restricted Thatcher Yard, she was lauded by the developer for her tireless efforts to get the project built.

To be fair, Park did attempt to put the brakes on the Ramada project before it opened.  In April, 2021, she and 400 of her neighbors appealed the project’s fast-tracked Public Works permit, citing a failure to notify the community of the change of use as well as safety concerns.

But as we reported at the time, “During the Board’s deliberations, there was no discussion of the conditions requested by the community.”   Given that the Ramada is three blocks from two elementary schools, those conditions seemed reasonable at the time.  But unbeknownst to the community, the mortgage on the property mandated that it be a “low barrier” facility, meaning PATH didn’t even have the option to screen occupants for prior criminal convictions, registration as sex offenders or mandate sobriety on site as the community wished. By the time it was emptied, two of its residents had died of overdoses.

In May of last year, Park filed a motion that not only requested a report from the CAO on the status of the Ramada project, but an inventory of the empty rooms in all project Homekey sites.  After hundreds of millions of dollars spent to convert hotels like the Ramada “quickly and cost-effectively”, no one knows, exactly, how many projects are simply languishing.  At the September meeting of the Venice Neighborhood Council, Park’s Venice Field Deputy Sean Silva verified that this report has yet to materialize.

Which is not to say that the City Administrator hasn’t been busy when it comes to the Ramada.  Within the 56 documents produced by my CPRA there is an infuriating email exchange between the CAO and representatives from PATH Ventures.

It reads like a hostage negotiation.

Time and again the CAO implores the developer to move forward with the project, only to be told that they need more money.  So the CAO – which, to be clear, are not the ones responsible for building the project – goes out of their way to identify and acquire new sources of funding.  $1.5 million in HHH money.  A $1.2 million construction loan from a non-profit that specializes in facilitating projects in “economically distressed” communities (the Ramada is about a mile from the Venice Pier).  Rental subsidies.  And, finally, the conversion of their $11 million mortgage note into one that, for all intents and purposes, really doesn’t need to get paid back…ever.

At no point in my four years of reporting on this project has the developer, or anyone else for that matter, cited CM Park’s actions (or lack thereof) as a reason why the Ramada has yet to be renovated.

The developer’s attitude – calling the shots and unapologetically insatiable for more funds, even when the total cost exceeded the limits of credibility – is symptomatic of the real reason the Project Homekey program went so far off the rails.  As the L.A. Alliance audit showed, “LAHSA and the city routinely approved invoices from service providers without verifying whether the billed services were actually provided. Payments were often processed based on high-level summaries, with little scrutiny of receipts or actual service delivery.”

The County’s audit was equally damning, revealing that $50 million in advances had been doled out to various not for profits with no formal agreements on how the money would be repaid.  In March of last year, LAHSA paid $800,000 to two whistleblowers, keeping their very serious allegations of misspent funds and unprofessional conduct out of the public eye.

Los Angeles’s vast network of not-for-profit housing developers has thrived in this no-rules, big money environment.  As I reported a year ago, PATH Ventures more than doubled their reported assets between 2019-2022, to $70 million, a figure that doesn’t include 23 multi-unit properties, including the Ramada.  One year ago, the Current reported that over 70% of Homekey-funded rooms in Los Angeles are still vacant.

Can any politician be blamed for not single-handedly overhauling this broken system?

Fortunately, what Sue Pascoe rightfully called the Homeless California Gold Rush may be finally held to account for its failings.  In April, the CEO of LAHSA resigned, and the County voted to withhold its funding for the organization.  Last week, former L.A. City Controller Ron Galperin (who in 2022 authored an in-depth analysis of Proposition HHH spending which was met with swift condemnation from the organization representing affordable housing developers) was tapped to oversee the city’s homelessness numbers.  And according to LAist, in late May the County “commissioned a months-long outside investigation” into those whistleblower allegations.

As projects like the Ramada sit empty, the city faces fiscal challenges that no longer allow for indiscriminately spending millions of dollars without accountability.  Real change is necessary, and the time for political finger-pointing is over.

This entry was posted in Homelessness. Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Bonin Points Fingers: Not My Fault

  1. Diane says:

    It’s all a grift.
    Everyone got their piece of the pie but no project will ever be completed.
    Bonin and group are grifters …. it’s not that complicated

  2. Cindy Simon says:

    With all this money jumble going on, the LA City Council voted to spend the big bucks – $2.6 billion – on an expansion to DTLA convention center… drawing taxpayer funds away from essential city services. What will the expansion provide us with… a venue to host Judo in the 2027 Olympics.

  3. Finn-Olaf Jones says:

    I get triggered by Bonin’s name as he’s also responsible for the insane, $30MM cost overruns to the landscaping in Potrero Canyon which, as we all predicted, was too ugly and too overly-fenced in to be used, and the fence maze was dangerous should there ever be a fire. And we were all too right. 100 people at the most went in there every day after it opened, mostly dog walkers who didn’t mind that our once wide open village commons seemed to have been redesigned by East German border guards. Now the expensive, awkward (all those barriers surrounding a single narrow track!) and ugly park is in ruins and my prediction that it was a mistake to fence it in as it was the only escape route should Swarthmore ever be hit by fire was 100% correct. We had a petition signed by almost all the rim dwellers where we specifically warned about the fire danger, I met with him personally, but he was too arrogant to listen and he thought we had unlimited funds to to build his eyesore without any input from the rest of us. When we rebuild the Palisades, let’s also make sure to get our commons back and tear out Bonin’s expensive and ugly barriers. Local wildlife which disappeared despite promises that they would squeeze through the badly designed gaps will also appreciate it. The restored, open commons will also make reconstruction of the surrounding neighborhoods a lot easier. Next time we get wildfires that canyon will be invaluable for both fire fighting and escape. It would be suicide to restore the barriers.

  4. Romy says:

    “With all this money jumble going on, the LA City Council voted to spend the big bucks – $2.6 billion – on an expansion to DTLA convention center”

    I’m sorry Cindy Simon, but appearance is the most important thing these days. We can’t expect to have an important world wide event like the Olympics be hosted in a ratty old convention center, can we? How would that make Gavin Newsome look?

    There are priorities involved here. And the most important priority is to show the world just how fabulous LA is.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *