“More Than Santa Baby” Nominated for a Webby

Palisades residents have a chance to show their support for one of Pacific Palisades’ most talented residents, Philip Springer, by voting for him for a Webby Award. The trailer of a recent documentary More Than Santa Baby, which details Springer’s musical accomplishments has been nominated click here.

Webby Awards are given for “Best of the Internet.”  Established in 1996 during the Web’s infancy, The New York Times hailed the Webby Awards as the leading international award honoring excellence on the Internet, including Websites and Mobile sites.

Spring is not a stranger to the Webby Awards, in 2024, he won for Best Individual Performance when as a 97-year-old, he performed Beethoven’s Moonlight Sonata for his daughter Tamar, and it went viral.

The trailer nominated was from the documentary More than Santa Baby that celebrated the life and music of Springer, who turns 100 on May 12.

The film, written and directed by Tamar, goes far beyond the iconic song to explore the depth of his musical legacy and the extraordinary resilience that has defined his journey through nearly a century of music. Along the way, Philip’s story intersects with legendary performers including Eartha Kitt, Frank Sinatra, Elvis Presley, Aretha Franklin, and Judy Garland, all of whom brought his compositions to life.

“Please ask people to vote,” Tamar said, noting that the awards ceremony will be May 11. “This would be a wonderful 100th birthday acknowledgment for him.” Voting is through April 16 click here..

Cut + Run Founder and editor Steve Gandolfi is the co-producer on the trailer. (Gandolfi also lost his home in the Palisades Fire.) Eric Henson is the editor. Tamar praised the company “Cut + Run is a world class editing company.”

Posted in Arts, Film/Television | Leave a comment

DWP Comes Through for Pacific Palisades –  15 Years Late

(Editor’s note: in 2012, it became apparent there wasn’t enough energy to meet electricity demand with the current distribution station in the Palisades. Then a DWP executive Jack Waizenegger said there were problems with the proposed pole-top distribution stations “the PTD is fused and has no backup transformer, plus it has overhead exposure and minimal remote monitoring.” Both switching/monitoring and overhead exposure may have caused problems during the Palisades Fire.)

These high voltage electrical poles at Temescal and Sunset were to be torn down once a new distributing station is built. Now they are to be replaced, once undergrounding is complete.

By HANK WRIGHT

Well, blow me down with a feather and call me a DWP ratepayer… After sixteen months of what can only be described as an Olympic-caliber performance in the art of saying nothing with great authority, the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power showed up to the March 26 Pacific Palisades Community Council webinar and did the unthinkable. They outlined a plan. With milestones. Hedged milestones, mind you — this is still Los Angeles — but milestones nonetheless…

Watching nearly 350 Palisadians on Zoom react to an actual sequenced timeline was like watching hostages receive a sandwich. Gratitude, suspicion, and hunger, all at once…

Now, did I hear a parent in the back of the virtual room — let’s call him a taxpayer with a long memory — muttering the most devastating eight words in civic governance: “Now, how hard was that?”

Sixteen months of whining, kvetching, lecturing, and performing various bureaucratic interpretive dances after the Palisades Fire, and it turns out LADWP had a plan all along. They just needed the right motivation to share it…12 people dying and  nearly 7,000 business/residents destroyed during the Palisades Fire. The emotional and economic toll is staggering and continues to mount.

Which brings us, as it always does in Los Angeles, to the motivation…

Funny thing about undergrounding power lines — at some point, you need the people whose ground you’re going under and place transformers on to sign something. A Right of Entry affidavit, they call it. Sign here, allow our equipment on your property, and we’ll schedule the actual conversation about compensation levels sometime before our board meets in Q2.

This is an example of what the above group equipment that is used when utilities are put underground. It may have to go on some resident’s property.

The community, naturally, is being asked to trust the same institution that spent 16 months describing its plans as “ongoing.” To be fair, LADWP did note they are working with the city attorney on “compensation levels.”

One is tempted to note that the timing of LADWP’s sudden transparency — Alphabet Streets starting in January 2027, with full completion by 2031— coincides precisely with the moment that DWP needs something from residents.

One is tempted to ask what alternatives were explored, what community input beyond the unanimous cry of “we want undergrounding” shaped the sequencing, and why Castellammare and Sunset Mesa drew the short straw and will be watching the rest of the Palisades go underground while they wait.

One is tempted. But one was cautioned not to look a gift horse in the mouth, particularly a horse that took 16 months to arrive at the stable (and more than 15 years after the call)…

The plan, in all its glory: residential undergrounding begins January 2027 — and DWP is “actively trying to accelerate this,” which in city-speak means 2027 is the floor.

According to a new California law electrical wires should go underground.

Overhead line removal begins late 2029. Full project completion: 2031. The Sunset Boulevard backbone conduit, which has been under construction since March 2025, continues through June 2027 — work that was temporarily halted last year after a contractor fatality.

DWP terminated that contract and, with the mayor’s office holding their hand, onboarded a replacement in three weeks – a  process normally takes close to a year.

Remarkable what a little scrutiny can do for institutional efficiency…

The voltage upgrade in Pacific Palisades from 5 kV to 12 kV is genuinely good news. It matches what Burbank uses — “if Burbank can do it” being apparently the gold standard of LA civic achievement — and conveniently eliminates the need to build a new distribution station at Marquez Elementary. One assumes the PTA is relieved…

An $877 million request to FEMA was made to cover the cost of undergrounding was denied. An appeal was submitted on or around March 19. The government has 90 days to respond.

Meanwhile, the DWP’s Zaraya Oliver Griffin noted that the current federal environment is “unlike anything she’s seen in 22 years.” She has seen things. DWP spent approximately a week in Washington, D.C. meeting with federal legislators.

Some funds were released. They went to other states. Perhaps because Governor Gavin  Newsom has been bagging on the current Administration. Nothing like biting the hand that feeds you. This is the part of the story that would be darkly funny if it weren’t happening to people who lost their homes…

If the FEMA appeal fails and arbitration is lost, the cost gets spread across all LADWP customers citywide. Every Angeleno paying a DWP bill would help fund Palisades undergrounding. This is the outcome Zaraya described as something “DWP is trying to avoid at all costs.” One imagines Boyle Heights ratepayers would agree…

The state, in a move Zaraya said she had never seen before, wrote an extensive letter of support for the appeal (better late than never and probably without Governor Newsom’s knowledge). The state never does that. When Sacramento writes a letter voluntarily, you know something unusual is afoot. Whether the current federal administration finds the argument persuasive remains, shall we say, an open question…

Zaraya’s top ask to the community: contact federal representatives and, in her word, “avalanche” them with requests to approve the appeal. DWP will share specific names and contacts through the community council.

This is how we’ve arrived at a situation where a utility is asking fire survivors, in addition to rebuilding their lives, to do federal lobbying after our leaders have rhetorically poisoned the well.

Welcome to the new normal…

Reza Akef, the PPCC infrastructure committee chair, added his own ask: when DWP begins right-of-entry outreach in Q3 2026, respond quickly. He mentioned a goal of 30 days for community-wide turnaround. Thirty days. For agreements involving easements on private property whose compensation terms haven’t been finalized yet. One marvels at the optimism…

Snapped electrical poles/lines may have contributed to the fire.

A community member raised the obvious question about Rustic Canyon and Santa Monica Canyon — vegetation-heavy areas sitting at the end of the undergrounding queue — and the fire risk that implies. Dave Hansen, LADWP’s new interim director, explained that undergrounding is one of several hardening methods: covered conductor, composite poles, steel poles, fiberglass crossarms. Overhead doesn’t have to mean unsafe, he said, with the confidence of a man who did not watch his house burn after the transformer blew. Another DWP official added that those areas are in the 4th interval, with active work beginning in 2028. Hardening measures will “bridge the gap.” The gap being, conservatively, two to three fire seasons…

A note on the water pressure question: during the Palisades fire, the problem was not power. The pumps had power. What they lacked was water pressure (some might call it water volume – like the volume removed when the Santa Ynez reservoir and the Chautauqua Dip reservoir.  Where is 100 million+ gallons of water when you need it?) — demand overwhelmed the system and the pumps couldn’t pump empty lines. DWP had crews out trying to boost pressure (perhaps they should have brought some of their 300 water DWP trucks with them). They couldn’t overcome the demand.

The new electrical design includes remote-operated sectionalizers allowing circuits near vegetation to be shut down remotely, without waiting for a technician. This is the kind of detail that, had it existed sixteen months ago, might have changed the conversation considerably…

And then, the moment of the evening: the yard sign.

Team Palisades and the PPCC have produced a sign. A physical, corrugated-plastic sign, to be installed in your parkway, expressing community support for undergrounding. Democracy, rendered in lawn signage, 24 by 18 inches, visible from the street…

To be fair — and one is trying, genuinely trying, to be fair — the sign serves a real purpose. It signals organized community support to the officials who still need that community’s easements.

It is, in a very real sense, leverage. The sign says: we are watching, we are coordinated, and we remember what happened when you weren’t…

Sign up for your sign — and yes, the pun was absolutely intended — at: click here.

Team Palisades handles installation. You provide the name, address, and optional phone number. They provide the sign. The city provides the inspiration, free of charge, sixteen months running…

For more: palisadespower.ladwp.com. Infrastructure committee: [email protected].

To view the March 26 meeting . . . .the recording was promised to YouTube by March 27 (Whopps missed it). DWP slides will appear on the PPCC website (due date uncertain).

April brings a water-specific presentation from DWP, a public works town hall on streets and sidewalks, and a right-of-entry town hall. The calendar is suddenly full. One notes that it took a denied FEMA claim and a community that won’t sign anything to produce this level of scheduling ambition…

Meanwhile, Mayor Bass heads to Washington in mid-April to continue advocating for federal funding. She and Councilwoman Park sent a joint letter to the CPUC the day of the meeting urging telecom companies to underground their lines in parallel with DWP trenching. Park called it “senseless” to trench for power without burying comms simultaneously. It is senseless. It has been the default approach for decades. Better senseless late than never…

More dots to follow. There are always more dots.

(The first picture below shows a property where all wires have been put underground. The second shows no undergrounding, communication lines are on poles at the back existing easement. Electricity goes to the house from the front of the street.) 


 

 

 

Posted in Community, News | 2 Comments

DWP Underground Game Needs a “Sign”

A campaign style sign is now available for all residents who support undergrounding utilities.

It is physical, corrugated-plastic sign, to be installed in a resident’s parkway, expressing community support for undergrounding and providing a much-needed overview through a QR code.

The request form was posted, but this is pure Democracy, rendered in lawn signage, 24 by 18 inches, visible from the street…

The sign signals organized community support to officials who still need each landowners’ easements. It is, in a very real sense, leverage. The sign says: we are watching, we are coordinated, and we remember what happened when you weren’t…

Sign up for your sign — and yes, the pun was absolutely intended — at: click here.

Volunteers handle installation. You provide the name, address, and optional phone number. They provide the sign. Signs are available at the American Legion. The city provided the inspiration, free of charge, sixteen months running…

Posted in General | 1 Comment

Junior Lifeguard Tryouts Held at Maggie Gilbert Aquatics Center

L.A. County Lifeguards posed for a photo before they started running swim tests for more than 500 hopefuls for the L.A. Junior Lifeguard program at the Maggie Gilbert Aquatic Center.

The Palisades High School Maggie Gilbert Aquatic Center was opened on Sunday, March 29, for a long-standing tradition, tryouts for Junior Lifeguards.

More than 500 youth, ages 9 to 17, tried to make the timed swimming test, which is requirement to enroll in the summer program.

“It was an incredible turnout,” said MGAC Aquatic Director Brooke King. “I committed to this event last year although we didn’t know for sure how things were going to go.”

After the 2025 Palisades Fire, students only returned to Pali High in January 2026. The two pools at the center opened in March.

“The Jr. Lifeguard team believed we’d be open so they could return,” King said. “I appreciate their faith in us.”

Junior Guards is a rite of passage for many young Palisadians. The ocean program provides instruction in water safety, swimming, body surfing, surfing, physical conditioning, competition skills, first aid, lifesaving, rescue techniques, CPR and the use of professional lifesaving equipment. Two five-week sessions are held at different lifeguard stations on the state beaches, and one is annually held at Will Rogers Tower 15.

To qualify, a youth has to swim 100 yards within 1:50 minutes or faster. If a child does not pass their initial swim test but is within 10 seconds of a passing time, they may receive one additional attempt that same day. Any Junior Lifeguard who successfully completed the 2025 Junior Lifeguard Program is automatically accepted into the 2026 program.

“This pool serves our Pali High students, these kids, and the entire
Community,” King said. “Seeing them back on this deck — that was everything.”

“I started swimming when I was nine because I couldn’t meet the Junior Lifeguards standard,” Palisadian Jordan Wilimovsky said in a 2016 interview. “I joined a club team that summer and stuck with it.”

He went on to win swimming competitions in Junior Guards. Wilimovsky won a gold medal at the 2015 Open Water swimming championships in Russia. At the 2016 Summer Olympics he competed in swimming and open water events, the first American to swim in both types of events.

Lanes were set up, so swimmers could try to swim 100 yards in 1:50 or better on March 29.

This year two junior lifeguard sessions will be held:

Session 1: Monday, June 15, – Friday, July 10
Session 2: Monday, July 13, – Friday, August 7

State beaches where the Junior Lifeguard program will be held this summer include:
• Avalon, Catalina
• Cabrillo Beach
• Torrance Beach
• Redondo Beach at Avenue A
• Tim Kelly (TK) at 2nd Street, Hermosa Beach
• Hermosa 14th at Hermosa Pier
• Manhattan at Marine Street
• El Segundo at the Jetty
• Venice at Venice Blvd. North
• Santa Monica at Tower 28
• Will Rogers at Temescal Canyon
• Zuma Beach

Posted in Kids/Parenting, Sports | Leave a comment

“Paw It Foreward Campaign Beyond Thee”

Spring de Haviland (hat) presents awards to Chaplain S.T. Williams (left), Commander Joe Ramierez and Ranee Rubio. In the stroller is Major Yoda.

Retired Coast Guard Member Spring De Haviland presented the awards, for the “Paw it Foreward Campaign Beyond Thee” on March 20 at the Santa Monica Pier. Officer Jacob Holloway, a Santa Monica Police Office and Marine veteran received a “Beyond the Best Award.

Throughout the morning, de Haviland, who served more than 30 years in the military, passed out carnations to passersby to encourage small acts of kindness.

The 16th Annual Spring Festival is organized by De Haviland to recognize, those who often go under the radar. She highlights military, their families, Blue Star families and those who support the military.

Receiving an Ultimate Gold Star award was Cindy Horejsi, spouse of U.S. Air Force Colonel, who volunteers with Los Angeles Military Charitable Fund, and is an A.F. Hangar Thrift Store volunteer. Also receiving the honor was Fabian Lekowicz, creator of Santa Monica Close up web site and photojournalist.

She recognized members of the Ronald Reagan American Legion Post 283’s that included Chaplain S.T. Williams ( U.S. Navy Commander, retired); Post 283 Commander Joe Ramierez (U.S. Marine Commander, retired) and Post 283 Ranee Rubio, U.S. Army Major.

This year she gave special thanks to Santa Monica Pier Executive Director, Jim Harris and Events and Film director Leo Erickson.

De Haviland also visits veterans at the VA Medical Center, where she brings small gifts and humor to boost morale. Her work has earned a Heroes Award from the Santa Monica Chamber of Commerce.

De Haviland said that awardees for the ceremony are selected by a diverse panel of iconic humanitarians and award winning leaders.

Cindy Horejsi (left), Fabian Lewkowicz  were given an award by Spring de Haviland. All were enjoying a nearly perfect day at the Santa Monica Pier.

Posted in Holidays | Leave a comment

Four Candidates Explain Reasons for Running for Insurance Commissioner

Four candidates running for insurance commissioner (left to right) Patrick Wolff, Merritt Farren, Steven Bradford and Ben Allen answered questions at a forum held at the Palisades Recovery Center.

Insurance Commissioner, an elected office in California since 1998, may be among the most closely watched race this year. The incumbent Ricardo Lara is terming out. He has been widely criticized for taking at least 32 luxury trips – much of it funded by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners.  Not long after taking office, Lara was found to be soliciting money from firms he was in charge of regulating.

Then, California burned and many were left without insurance, partial insurance or inadequate insurance. Many affected by the 2025 Palisades and Eaton Fires have still not recovered policy limits 16 months later.

Whoever is selected will need to fix a broken insurance system in California. Eleven candidates are vying for the position.  Four spoke at the Palisades Recovery Center on March 27.

That group included three Democrats: State Sen. Benjamin Allen, a 48-year-old attorney in Santa Monica, former state Sen. Steven Bradford, 67, who grew up in Gardena where he got his political start 26 years ago with a city council post, and Patrick Wolff, a 58-year-old San Francisco financial analyst with an insurance background. The lone Republican was Merritt Farren. He has been a life-long democrat, up until the Fire that destroyed his home in the Via la Olas Bluffs. A 65-year-old media and technology attorney, he fought State Farm’s controversial rate hike request.

Over two hours, the candidates answered numerous questions including “What is your plan to fix the market?”

The four candidates were congenial and generally agreed that the system is broken. After introducing themselves, they took turns answering the questions.

“The fires were caused by massive mistakes” and the person in charge had “no experience,” Farren said, and added that the entire system including the “FAIR Plan needed to go.”

Wolff said that sustainable insurance strategy reform is needed. “California regulations have not allowed insurance companies to use forward-looking models or to include the cost of reinsurance.

There is a need to modernize the department Bradford said and, added “Insurance companies want to be California, we have to collaborate and bring them in.”

Allen said that the state has to figure out why insurance companies got so spooked and that the best fire science needs to be addressed. “It’s the risk mitigation that has to be done. This is an opportunity for us as a state to have risk reduction.”

How do you bring insurers back?

Speaking first, Wolff said, “we need to hold companies accountable and make sure pricing is fair. We need to align incentives.” He said that the state needs to do a much better job of taking care of land – more governmental actions are needed, which will help residents.

Bradford said, “A rate increase should be on risks, not profits.” To do that the consumer needs to be better educated. “We’re here today because of Prop. 103.”

Passed in 1988, that proposition limits the amount of money that insurers can set for rates. “Nineteen other states pay more for insurance than California,” Bradford said.

Insurance companies and homeowners needed to be balanced and “at the end of the day we need to provide a road map,” Allen said.

“The track record in California is where we are today,” Farren said. “It isn’t fixed for consumers nor is it fixed for insurers.” He said that Prop. 103 was a good thing but could be revised by legislators. “There is a lot that could be done administratively.”

The four men were asked about how difficult it would be to come in and head the state insurance commission, which has nearly 1,400 employees.

“I want to listen to people and learn from them,” Wolff said, and added that “it could be an advantage coming in as a legislative outsider.”

Whoever wins the position, Farren said he likened it to “the role becomes the adult in the room. There needs to be someone to ruffle the feathers, and someone who can find middle ground.” He said working in the corporate world, he brought people together for a win-win.

Bradford, who has served as an elected official for 26 years, said “You have to be an administrator who brings people together.” He also pointed out he would be there to do that because in all of his elected positions “in 26 years, I have had perfect attendance.”

“I am the current chair of the [Senate] utility committee,” Allen said. “One bill I’m proud of is SB 54 [Plastic pollution prevention].” He said it passed “through painstaking efforts and never taking no for an answer.”

About the FAIR Plan, Bradford provided the history. It originated in the Watts 1965 riots. In neighborhoods of color, property owners could no longer access insurance. A prototype, the FAIR plan, became a government—organized pool of property insurers operating in a given state.

As fires intensified in California, more and more insurers left the state, leaving the FAIR plan as the only option for people state-wide.

Farren advocated for reinsurance “CAL Reinsure,” a plan he developed that shifts community wildfire risk off insurers and onto a state-organized reinsurance authority, allowing traditional insurers to write policies statewide without fear of catastrophic losses from major fires.

A reinsurer is essentially insurance for insurance companies.

“The FAIR Plan is a huge problem for those who are forced on it and is largely responsible for driving insurers out of the state,” Farren said.

Bradford agreed saying that the state needed to start migrating people off the plan “and fix this market and stabilize it.”

Allen suggested that developments in high fire zones should not be greenlighted, that more new housing should not be allowed to be created that would then go on the FAIR plan. He said that the state should be looking to depopulate the plan.

“The way to depopulate the market,” Wolff said, “is to fix the market.  FAIR plan rates should be structurally sound.”

Other fixes suggested by candidates, included Farren saying the insurance contracts need to be rewritten in a clear way, so that people understood exactly what they were getting.

Wolff addressed fixing the way people were insured, because so many were underinsured, they can’t afford to rebuild.

Another topic candidates agreed upon was if someone pays for $500,000 of insurance, they should receive that amount and not have to negotiate for a claim payout by providing with receipts and photos. The four touched on claims adjusters who come from out of state and have different prices than the ones that apply to the community where they are working.

To read more about each candidate: Farren click here, Wolff click here, Bradford click here and Allen click here.To view the two-hour forum:click here.

In addition to the four at the forum, others running include Democrat Jane Kim; Republicans Robert Howell, Stacy Korsgaden, Sean Lee and Eric Thor Aarnio; Peace and Freedom Educardo Vargas; and Independent Keith Davis. The top two finishers in the June 2 primary, regardless of party preferences, will move onto the November 3 general election.

Posted in Elections | 1 Comment

What Does Los Angeles Get for Its $1 Billion?

(Editor’s note: After listening to Nythia Raman, L.A. Mayor Karen Bass and Adam Miller speak at the Palisades Democratic Mayoral Forum on Sunday about the need for more affordable housing to help the homeless, Tim Campbells March 30 post on Substack presented a different view.)

Only through intervention from local volunteers through the Pacific Palisades Task Force on Homelessness (and the Beach Detail) are homeless provided with other options than sleeping in tunnels.

A homeless tent was set up next to a playground on Mother’s Beach.

 

By TIM CAMPBELL

In any given year, the City of Los Angeles budgets about $1 billion for homelessness. That figure doesn’t include related indirect costs like LAFD emergency medical response or police calls.

For perspective, the City’s current total budget is approximately $13 billion, so LA spends 7.7 percent of its budget on just over one percent of its population. As we’ve read in several recent news stories, the City has struggled to show taxpayers what we’re getting for the money.

For the past several months, the City of LA has been engaged in a protracted court battle to avoid producing raw data on homelessness programs. Although the Mayor and Council claim there is a downward trend in unsheltered homelessness, independent audits and reports contradict those claims, showing how the City’s sloppy data and financial management bring into question if there has been any meaningful reduction in homelessness.

Even when people enter the shelter/housing system, they rarely receive the services they need to stay off the streets. Audits and reviews from L.A. County and the court-appointed audit firm Alvarez & Marsal (A&M) have shown how neither LAHSA nor the City verify service levels before paying providers.

Many reports, including those from the City Controller, show far more people fall back into homelessness than attain housing.

And we must remember there is a difference between what the City budgets versus what it actually spends. City Controller Kenneth Mejia recently issued a press release stating almost half of the billion dollars budgeted this fiscal year remains unspent and uncommitted. City leaders offered little in the way of explanation for their failure other than to claim they’ll spend the money next year.

Except the Controller said the City only spent about half its budget last year. If it didn’t spend its budget last year, and it hasn’t spent half this year, there is little reason to think it will spend its budget in the future. In short, the City doesn’t know what it gets for the money it spends and doesn’t spend the money it has, yet it consistently claims it lacks the financial resources needed to properly respond to the homelessness crisis.

All of these numbers should concern anyone following LA’s homelessness crisis and the City’s response. But we can’t forget there are real people behind these numbers and reports. On March 25, the LA Times reported that a city crew was about to seal a storm drain lid when a homeless person suddenly appeared in the catch basin and casually strolled away.

As disturbing as that incident was, what is truly concerning is that neighbors have been calling about people going in and out of the storm drain for a year, and the only reason the City finally took action is that a community member posted video of people slipping underground on social media; in the other words city officials had to be shamed into talking action.

Besides an unknown number of people using the catch basin as a shelter, for months, neighbors have been asking to have an encampment between their homes and the 110-Freeway cleared.

Although the sight of a man popping out of manhole might initially seem amusing, the novelty wears thin when we think about human beings reduced to living in storm sewers like modern-day troglodytes, while City officials boast about unprecedented numbers of people sheltered and housed. And lest you think that incident took place in some dark corner of the city, the manhole is located near Manchester and the 110 freeway in a neighborhood of working- and middle-class homes.

[Clarification of some news stories from a former Public Works manager. The person was living in a storm drain catch basin, not a sanitary sewer (e.g. not the sewer that drains your bathroom water). Contrary to what we see in movies, most underground storm drainpipes in residential areas are rarely more than 60” in diameter–too small for a person, especially if there are a few inches of water in the pipe. Regardless, storm water catch basins are full of trash, animal waste, and chemical runoff–they are dangerous; cleaning crews often wear protective gear when they enter one].

Besides people wallowing in storm drains, what else have taxpayers got for their $1 billion per year? If we believe the advocates who claim homelessness is primarily a housing problem, we should expect our money has been used to create affordable and supportive housing.

However, as a series of articles in the Westside Current has shown, thousands of units remain incomplete or vacant because the City can’t issue the proper permits for buildings it already owns. Ironically, while they seem unable to open housing facilities they’ve already completed, City officials like Councilmember Yaroslavsky are pushing to complete the development of a supportive housing development on Shelby Drive even though a key player has been indicted on federal fraud charges and the transaction has been shrouded in opaque closed-door deals.

So, much of what the City has spent on what is supposedly the main contributor to homelessness has been squandered on unfinished projects or paying costs that have spiraled out of control.
Apparently unsatisfied with passively wasting money on underperforming services or stalled developments, the City has been more proactive defending its waste by spending millions to avoid accountability.

The City Attorney has requested, and he City Council has approved, almost $7.5 million in payments to law firm Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher to defend the City from an ongoing lawsuit over the City’s inability to show any substantive progress on homelessness. The plaintiff in the suit, the L.A. Alliance for Human Rights, has been challenging the City’s claims of success by demanding the data to support those claims. [Disclaimer: I do occasional volunteer audit work for the Alliance].

Even though testimony from City officials has brought into question such things as how the City counts a shelter bed as “occupied,” City officials continue to pay Gibson Dunn nearly $1,300 per hour per attorney to block the release of its raw data and otherwise obstruct issuing meaningful performance data.

Officials may have good reason to hide the data; just how ineffective the City’s homelessness programs are is shown in a recent City CAO report. Despite the cheery language, the report shows few people exit interim housing to permanent housing, especially those who have been trapped in temporary housing for more than two years.

Of course, homelessness does not have a monopoly on waste. As Christopher LeGras described in a recent Westside Current article, the City has approved $173 million for agreements with law firms for services like eviction protection; these same firms are often plaintiffs against the City.

LA Legal Aid, one of the recipients of the City’s contract largesse, has sued the city to stop it from clearing homeless encampments. In other words, while the City spends at least $36 million on CARE+ encampment clearances, it’s paying legal firms to oppose those clearances.

Waste is habitual and structural; it’s easy to accept it as “business as usual” and continue to sign contracts with the same organizations over and over. One of the reasons the City Attorney used to justify contracting with the same firms that sue the city is that it was too complex to hire new providers to take over existing cases. Officials would rather pay firms that routinely sue the City than do the hard work of finding new ones. That is not only lazy, it’s a gross misuse of public funds.

What do taxpayers get for the $1 billion budgeted for homelessness? People living in storm drains. Shelters run like Bedlams, bereft of services and almost useless for preparing people for permanent housing. Thousands of empty permanent housing units left vacant while more than six in 10 homeless people are unsheltered. Endless press opportunities boasting about successes that simply don’t exist. And millions spent to avoid providing proof of those successes.

What we don’t get is real progress. Thousands left on the street where six die every night. Contracts with no performance measures renewed over and over with no changes. Leaders complicit in supporting a failed system and expecting the public to docilely accept failure as success. Waste on a scale so massive it beggars the imagination. People living in storm drains should shock the conscience of any decent citizen.

Before any kind of reform can occur, local leaders must be honest with their constituents and face the truth that their programs have failed. Tinkering at the edges of a broken system will not work. If current leaders aren’t willing to take the bold steps necessary to make homelessness programs work, perhaps it is time for voters to look for new leaders.

A homeless person, slept in a planter, the wheelchair next to it.

Posted in Homelessness, Viewpoint | 2 Comments

Special Guests Visit Simon Meadow

The Easter Bunny was one of the surprise guests at the egg hunt.

If one was anywhere near Simon Meadow, at the corner of Temescal Road and Sunset Boulevard on March 28, the excitement was contagious as children gathered with Easter baskets, waiting to hunt for eggs.

Nearly 150 people gathered for the Spring Festival and Egg Hunt. Two special guests, Councilmember Traci Park and a big white Easter bunny helped children ages 3 to 12 in the search.

“It was a beautiful day on Saturday,” said Lowe Family YMCA Executive Director Jim Kirtley. “All it takes is a little sun, a wee bit of sugar and some good hiding places to make fun community events.”

Kirtley said the Y has so many upcoming activities planned, including Friday Fun Nights starting April 10. (To see events, follow @palimaliymca.)

He said the rebuild of the YMCA building on Via de la Paz is moving along nicely and that they hope to start building before the end of the year. Kirtley promised to share plans once they are approved.

Look closely and you’ll see Councilmember Traci Park cheering her youngest constituents as they hunt for eggs in Simon Meadow.

There were plenty of eggs to find in Simon Meadow.

Posted in Holidays | Leave a comment

Brush Clearance Now a Town Project

Lots and parkways are overgrown, and plants have now started to dry out, leaving flammable brush.

People are being urged to buy a weed whacker and join the fun on Saturday, April 25. Clear your parkway, or your neighbors, and if you’re not building yet, trim those weeds.

Everyone in the Palisades is urged to join in clearing their parkway and lot – and greet your neighbors as the town is reclaimed.  Make it a belated Earth Day celebration.

City brush inspections begin May 1, and then notices will go out.

Las Casas owner Marge and Bob Gold paid their gardener to keep their parkway neat and their lot trimmed.  If you don’t want to trim your lot, maybe a neighbor’s gardener could be hired.

Bob and Marge Gold paid their gardener this past year to trim their parkway and lot.

Last year, residents were indignant, and rightly so when they received a brush clearance notice, just months after the Army Corps of Engineers had scraped their homes/debris, leaving only dirt on the lot.

A year later, the entire town is now filled with combustible fuel, just as homes are being framed and others completed. The heavy rains in February and the ash (which is great for growth), left some lots looking like small jungles.

The two weeks in March, when temperatures set record-breaking temperatures, dried everything out. Lot after lot, where there is no construction, is filled with dry brush.

LA City brush clearance requires property owners in Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones to cut weeds/grass to a maximum height of 3 inches within 200 feet of structures.

There are no structures left on the lot, but if another fire ignites, it would travel swiftly over the lots like a prairie fire, with nothing to stop it.

Mandatory City brush actions include removing dead trees, thinning brush, and trimming trees to 6 feet off the ground.  Once a property receives a notice that the lot is not in compliance the homeowner will have 20 days to comply. There will be a second inspection after that 20 days.

If a property remains in noncompliance after a failed re-inspection, it will be cleared by City contractors.  The property owner will be invoiced a noncompliance fee + an administrative fee + the contractors fee.

Trimming is needed for all the brush in the empty lots and on parkways.

Posted in Community, Environmental | 3 Comments

Palisades Democrats Query Three Mayoral Candidates

The Palisades Democrats hosted a mayoral candidate forum on March 29, via zoom. The event also included videos from the two CD 11 candidates.

Spencer Pratt

It was announced at the beginning of the forum that many Pacific Palisades residents had asked that the club include Spencer Pratt. A statement was read “We appreciate the interest in hearing from a wide range of voices at our events. However, PaliDems is a chartered Democratic club with a clear purpose: to support Democratic candidates and issues. We do not present ourselves as nonpartisan. Based on publicly available information, Mr. Pratt is a registered Republican, so we will not be including him in the forum, as our focus is on providing a platform for Democratic candidates who align with the mission of our club.”

Then the club ran a video from Faizah Malik, a socialist, who has been endorsed by the Democratic Socialists of America click here. A socialist was allowed time at a Democrat forum, but not a Republican.

Each mayoral candidate was allowed five to seven minutes to introduce themselves. Afterwards moderator Maryam Zar asked them questions. There was no interchange between the candidates. There was no fact checking on candidate statements.

Nythia Raman

Nythia Raman  was first and said “Over the last couple of years, our city, has fallen behind. We are making bad decisions that has left us rudderless. I want to fight for a different future.”

Raman has been a Councilmember for District 4 (Silver Lake, Echo Park and Atwater Park). She has a master’s degree in urban planning from MIT and was first elected to city position in 2020. She became chair of the Housing and Homelessness committee in early 2023.

She was asked what do you want to do as a mayor that you were not able to accomplish as councilmember?

Raman said she wanted to make sure there was greater accountability for homeless and for performance accountability for different city departments. “In the council I have not been able to push departments to move quickly,” she said.

Asked about how she felt about increasing density, aka SB 79, “I do advocate for greater density, but it should not be in the hills (Hollywood, Pacific Palisades),” Raman said. “It should be in areas where it is appropriate and safe.”

She was asked about her relationship with Bass. “I campaigned for Bass. I held a fundraiser for her,” Raman said, but cited poor fiscal management, and that the Mayor was not motivated by Angelino’s needs, but by political ambition, which grew to Raman’s increasing frustration and the decision to run.

Mayor Karen Bass
Photo: RICH SCHMITT

Mayor Karen Bass was next and made the case that she needed four more years to finish current projects/commitments. She accompanied a group of Palisadians who went to Sacramento to work on insurance and mortgage issues surrounding the Palisades Fire.

“I have relationships in Washington,” she said. “We need our FEMA money to finish infrastructure.” Bass said $8 billion was needed and she was lobbying for it.

“I’m working directly with Trump,” she said, “You might hear me be critical of Trump in public,” but she added “I am working behind the scenes with the President and EPA’s Lee Zeldin to bring relief to the Palisades.

“Palisadians have been a priority for me,” she said.

She was asked about the appointment of Janisse Quinones. “I do not feel Janisse was a mistake,” Bass said. “She started the undergrounding immediately.”

Bass was also asked about being in Ghana during the fire.

“When I came back, I asked Christine,‘what happened?’”

Her fire chief said, “We didn’t think it was going to be that serious.”

Bass counted one of her successes as decreasing homelessness. She had asked for an increase in money for police (city council didn’t pass it). She also is pushing for solar streetlights, that would help energy consumption and also stop the copper thefts.

Zar has long advocated for a Palisades rebuilding authority and asked by Raman and Bass their thoughts.

Raman said “I’d be open to starting one.”
Bass answered, “In concept I support it,” and then explained there were too many voices in the Palisades “and they were not in agreement about it.”

Bass said, “I would like to continue in a second term.”

Adam Miller

Adam Miller. When it was time for tech entrepreneur to speak, it took nearly 15 minutes to get him on the Zoom call.

He cited his 35 years of business experience and running nonprofits as reasons he would be a good mayor. “My experience is the city has a lot of problems that need fixing,” Miller said.

“I’ve been an outsider. That’s an advantage. I don’t have to serve other people I know. I don’t need the money,” he said and spoke about his contributions to helping the homeless, when he formed Better Angels, a homeless nonprofit that received $750,000 from FireAid.

He told people that 60 percent of the people end up on the street because of financial problems. (According to Cal Matters, 37 percent of homeless cite economic reasons.) Better Angels, according to Miller, provides a short-term eviction program. Anyone who has worked with the homeless on the streets learn addiction and mental illness are huge drivers. Miller said he had helped sponsor street events for the unhoused and that they came and got food and help.

After the Palisades Fire, he said Better Angeles pivoted and helped hundreds of people with security deposits. A question in the chat, “how many Palisades residents did you help?” went unanswered.

He cited the need for more affordable housing in the City. There are thousands of empty apartments, as nearly 26,000 Palisadians found out when they had to evacuate.

According to the Hill, Los Angeles County has seen a decline of nearly 54,000 people since the 2020 census. Apartment buildings in Santa Monica sit empty.

Miller pointed out “We need more affordable housing and that needs to come from the private sector. He said he had spoken to Tom Saffron about housing, who isn’t doing any housing with the city right now.

In 2022, the Housing Authority of the City of Los Angeles (HACLA) joined Mayor Eric Garcetti, Councilmember Mike Bonin, Thomas Safran & Associates and others to celebrate the official ribbon cutting ceremony for Missouri Place. Safran had partnered with HACLA on eleven Public Based Voucher projects, totaling 454 PBV units (and 908 total units).

In an October 2023 story (“Prominent Inglewood Developer Thomas Safran Involved in “Pay-to-Play” scheme with Curren Price”) alleged that Safran had provided Curren Price with $35,690  click here and click here.

Since he is a political outsider, Miller was asked if he has connections with the city or state to help with city needs. “I’m a big contributor to the Democratic party,” he said. “And I’m well connected to the tech community.”

Posted in News | 7 Comments