The Getty Villa entryway into the museum is striking. Shortly after it reopened in late June after the Palisades Fire had scorched the grounds, there were no tours available.
A resident called CTN and said, “The Getty has ‘fired’ all 350 of its docents, including me. They want to get rid of older, white women in the name of diversity, just like the Art Institute of Chicago did a few years back.”
In 2021, USA ran a story “A Chicago Museum ‘Fired’ Its Volunteers. Why Diversity Consultants Say It Was the Right Move.” And noted that “museum equity consultants say the programs are outdated, have too many barriers to entry and, as a result, often skew toward a certain demographic: Wealthy, white women.”
The story added a quote from Monica Williams, executive producer of The Equity Project, a Colorado-based equity, inclusion and diversity consulting firm, “Sometimes equity requires taking bold steps and actions.”
An art docent is a volunteer guide that leads tours and interacts with the public. They have intensive training in art history from early Greek and Roman (Villa) to contemporary. They have to attend classroom sessions and must shadow experienced docents before leading a tour.
Was it the case that the Getty wanted to purge its docent program of “wealthy grandmas?” Or was it just a disgruntled docent that spoke to CTN?
A copy of the dismissal letter sent to docents from Getty’s Keishia Gu, the Head of Education was obtained by CTN. Yes, the volunteers were “fired.”Getty Docent Letter
Gu wrote that the need for tours has decreased significantly over the past few years “as visitors are increasingly relying on other methods to access information about the collection or seeking out specialty experiences more tailored to their individual interests.” Gu noted other art institutions have seen a similar trend.
These trends meant a “new docent role” would be created. Every docent “let go” could submit a new application to be accepted and those selected would receive an interview in January. Then from March to May, the volunteers would be trained to lead tours.
CTN reached out to Getty Media Assistant Director of News & Media relations Alexandria Sivak and asked what the new training would involve and why the current docents just couldn’t be given that training.
“The reapplication process is an opportunity for docents to learn what is expected of the new program model and ensure they are prepared for the level of training we will be requiring,” Sivak said. “It’s also an opportunity for the department to recruit docents who are open to learning new skills and teach from a visitor-centered perspective.”
What is the new training? Sivak said “In addition to traditional art historical content, the new model will allow for specialty tours aligned with strategic initiatives—such as drawing-based tours, nature, movement and other interdisciplinary approaches.”
One Getty docent told CTN that tours were always crowded and “this is a way to get rid of the wealthy white middle-aged women and hire people of color. By firing everyone the Getty won’t be accused of discrimination.”
Expertise based on skin melanin is always hard to quantify, so instead CTN asked Sivak the average age of the current docent, to see if ageism was a factor.
She responded “Our docent corps includes individuals ranging from their 30s to retirement age, and we deeply value the institutional knowledge and lived experience they bring. This transition is about refining—not replacing—the current people in the program.”
CTN told Sivak the editor had asked the average age, not the range. Sivak responded that she had to check with Human Resources to see if she could disclose that. HR responded, “We prefer to respect the privacy of our volunteer docents are not comfortable releasing any personal information, including age.” Releasing a statistical average without a name
Sivak also said that the docent corps will be reduced “by how much will depend on how many docents are interested in reapplying for this new role, and how many are accepted.”
CTN wondered why docents/tours would be decreased now (since it’s not financial situation) with the upcoming World Cup and Olympics.
“Cultural institutions do not benefit from audience bumps when these events occur,” Sivak said.
And for the docents who do not want to reapply or might reapply and not be accepted after decades at the Getty, there are parting gifts: a $100 gift certificate to the museum store, 10 Friends, family and colleagues tickets (expire 2030), and a free one-year membership to the North American Reciprocal Museum Association.
Of corse, because the head of education is Keishia Gu at J. Paul Getty Museum. And
She attended BOTH Georgetown and Harvard (financial aid). Her Favorite artwork at Getty: Study of the Model Joseph by Théodore Géricault. She states, “Here is why I love that painting —because I didn’t like it at first. I thought it was a static portrait of an African American, and it made me sad. But then I learned from a DEAI [Diversity, Equity, Accessibility, and Inclusion]-focused session with the DOCENTS that Joseph was actually somewhat of a celebrity model in France back in the 1800s, and I was like: “Wait, what? The sad-looking portrait?” There you go, welcome to “DEI Getty”
If it were me, I’d never want to set foot in the Getty again, but I was against that eyesore being built in the first place. What’s rich is the museum store gift certificate which will enable one to drink coffee out of a cup that reminds them of the place they got fired from, while working for free.
I have a pretty good idea what the “new” facts the docents will be imparting to the public about the spectacular Getty collection will be, and how it was acquired…sigh.
This is quite sad. I was a docent at the Getty villa and loved until the Pandemic hit
And it was closed. It seemed liked people having docents lead the tours. We were not paid. I hope they find a good way to figure things out
Examples like this may be why Trump had such a following for his response to DEI
This is so disgusting I have no words
100 % Woke DEI behavior by yet again another museum. Getty Museum SHAME on you. You are discriminating against white people against women and against age.
What next burn all the art created by white people?
The abrupt action and the tone of the letter was very cold. The writer showed no
appreciation of these docents’ care, training, time, and personal commitment
to the Getty. The letter left a “bad taste” toward the Getty management. Personally,
I felt wounded after reading the letter even though I was strongly considering resigning at the end of the year, marking 20 years of commitment.
I’ve been a docent at the Getty center for over 20 years and am not an older white person. I’m of a different ethnicity and was not invited back for the new training. I was sent a letter to turn in my badge and parking permit. I think this is the staff wanting to get back to pre 2012 levels when the staff were the only ones who could give gallery tours. Docents mainly gave exterior or site tours of architecture and gardens and facilitated in the art information rooms. The staff was cut by 2/3 at that time by Jim Cuno in favor of a larger docent core who were trained to give gallery tours. This newest training is supposed to reduce the volunteer core from 250 to 50 docents. It is a decision made in favor of paid staff.
We were told that the new training would allow gallery and exterior ( site) docents to do exterior or interior tours but it would be a much smaller core.
They sent 5 questions online that were pretty innocuous and based on those questions the staff would decide who to interview. I received a letter yesterday stating my written application was not accepted. Additionally, our emeritus status and privileges are limited to 5 years instead of the lifetime we were promised when I joined.
This is an organization’s prerogative but it comes at a huge cost to those of us who felt very invested in the docent program. We are docents who had many opportunities to socialize and participate with staff and each other through events hosted by the Getty admin. Over the years, those events became fewer and presented at a much smaller scale. The resentment has grown within our core and many docents have left or been asked to leave based on minor infractions siting DEI which we were trained in for 3 years. This is basically streamlining for the staff to be more engaged with the public. Although hiring art educators and creating jobs is an admirable endeavor, asking volunteers to leave after giving 20+ years of service is heartbreaking. The days of volunteering in these types of institutions are going to be gone very soon.